The Macro and Sectoral Significance of an FTAAP

Kenichi Kawasaki

ESRI Discussion paper series from Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI)

Abstract: This paper discusses the relative significance of a Free Trade Area of the Asia-Pacific (FTAAP) at the macro and sectoral levels. The impacts of trade liberalization and facilitation measures in an FTAAP are studied using a Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) model of global trade. The dynamic aspects of capital formation and productivity improvements are incorporated into a standard static model based on the most updated version of a global trade database. Real GDP of the APEC economies will be boosted on average by 1.9 percent by trade liberalization measures and 0.4 percent by trade facilitation measures, respectively. However, because of differences in the trade structure of the economies, the relative macroeconomic benefits of the economies from several regional trade agreements are shown to differ largely. Moreover, the relative significance of negative impacts in sensitive sectors such as agriculture may also vary according to several scenarios of trade liberalization.

Pages: 31 pages
Date: 2010-08
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cmp, nep-int and nep-sea
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.esri.go.jp/jp/archive/e_dis/e_dis244/e_dis244.pdf (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 500 Can't connect to www.esri.go.jp:80 (No such host is known. )

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:esj:esridp:244

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in ESRI Discussion paper series from Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by HORI nobuko ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).