Pernicious Bias and Judicial Illegitimacy: Do Americans Perceive Diverse Judges as Inherently Biased?

Yoshikuni Ono and Michael A. Zilis

Discussion papers from Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI)

Abstract: Perceptions of procedural fairness play an integral role in the legitimacy of the legal system. We explore whether bias against women and minority judges undermines their perceived fairness of their rulings in court. Our exploration follows recent work on bias, but we offer a theoretical contribution by targeting its pernicious nature. Because women and minorities constitute a substantial portion of the bench, we do not expect most citizens to perceive them as entirely unfit to serve as judges. Rather, we argue that bias manifests in a subtle way – in the belief that diverse judges cannot fairly adjudicate controversies that involve their ingroup. To test our theory, we use a list experiment specifically developed to minimize social desirability effects. Our results highlight the pernicious nature of bias, providing some of the first insights into how stereotyping influences perceptions of the U.S. legal system, and suggest serious negative implications for the rule of law.

Pages: 23 pages
Date: 2020-04
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-law
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.rieti.go.jp/jp/publications/dp/20e028.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eti:dpaper:20028

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Discussion papers from Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by TANIMOTO, Toko ().