Do EU Funds Crowd Out Other Public Expenditures? Evidence on the Additionality Principle from the Detailed Czech Municipalities’ Data
Petr Janský,
Tomas Krehlik and
Jiri Skuhrovec
Additional contact information
Jiri Skuhrovec: Institute of Economic Studies, Faculty of Social Sciences, Charles University in Prague, Smetanovo nabrezi 6, 111 01 Prague 1, Czech Republic
No 2016/18, Working Papers IES from Charles University Prague, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute of Economic Studies
Abstract:
European Union funds flowing into budgets of public sector organisations of its member states should be additional to their nationally funded expenditures. To investigate this additionality principle systematically, we develop a new empirical method. Our main hypothesis is that some of the EU-funded projects are crowding out national public expenditures. Not being able to reject the hypothesis would be consistent with violating the additionality principle. To test the hypothesis we examine how EU funding translates into actual spending of relatively comparable municipalities of the Czech Republic. We innovatively match the municipal authorities’ budgetary data on EU-funded expenditure projects with their other, nationally funded, expenditures. We find no systemic crowding out of national public expenditures by EU funds at the level of operational programmes in the Czech municipalities’ data, which is consistent with no evidence of violating the additionality principle. Nonetheless, going down to the municipal level enable us to show how the results can pinpoint individual cases of EU fund’s potential mismanagement in Czech municipalities. Overall, we provide the first evaluation of the additionality principle at the level of individual recipients of EU funds and in doing so we develop a methodological approach potentially applicable to other fund recipients.
Keywords: European Union, EU Cohesion policy; EU funds; crowding out; additionality; municipalities (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 27 pages
Date: 2016-09, Revised 2016-09
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-eur, nep-ppm and nep-tra
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://ies.fsv.cuni.cz/sci/publication/show/id/5513/lang/cs (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 404 Not Found (http://ies.fsv.cuni.cz/sci/publication/show/id/5513/lang/cs [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://ies.fsv.cuni.cz/sci/publication/show/id/5513/lang/cs)
Related works:
Journal Article: Do EU funds crowd out other public expenditures? Evidence on the additionality principle from the detailed Czech municipalities’ data (2016) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:fau:wpaper:wp2016_18
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers IES from Charles University Prague, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute of Economic Studies Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Natalie Svarcova ().