Fragile African States: What Should Donors Do?

Collier Paul
Additional contact information
Collier Paul: Blavatnik School of Government

No P95, Working Papers from FERDI

Abstract: 1. IntroductionNecessarily, all donors will focus increasingly on fragile states. The more successful countries in Africa have achieved growing tax bases and are consequently now gaining access to global capital markets. For such countries, aid is becoming marginal. In contrast, fragile states, by the nature of their condition, have small tax bases and face risks which deter private capital: for them aid remains potentially important. Not only do donors provide a substantial proportion of government revenues; they bring expertise which is sorely lacking in fragile states; and they change incentives for government both intentionally through the conditions they set, and unintentionally through the revenues and expertise they provide.Donor practices have evolved considerably over recent decades. Donors have gradually learned how to operate effectively in those states which have governments that are reasonably representative of the interests of their citizens, and reasonably competent in managing public spending. In such states budget support free of policy conditions is likely to be the most effective modality for providing aid. Government ownership of an aid program maximizes the benefit from the superior local knowledge that it has, and minimizes interference in the accountability of government to citizens. Unfortunately, fragile states are not usually characterized by the combination of governments that are reasonably representative of the interests of their citizens, and reasonably competent in managing public spending: if they had both of these characteristics they would probably not be fragile. Yet without these characteristics, unconditional budget support is liable to be ineffective and can easily be counterproductive. Donor money is unlikely to be well-spent and can undermine the capacities that the state needs to develop. Donors therefore appear to face a dilemma. If the neediest countries are those in which aid is least effective, in allocating aid between countries the donor is faced with an uncomfortable trade-off between need and effectiveness.

Date: 2014-03
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-afr, nep-dev and nep-ppm
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.ferdi.fr/sites/www.ferdi.fr/files/publi ... wp95_collier_web.pdf (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 404 Not Found (http://www.ferdi.fr/sites/www.ferdi.fr/files/publication/fichiers/wp95_collier_web.pdf [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://ferdi.fr/sites/www.ferdi.fr/files/publication/fichiers/wp95_collier_web.pdf [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://ferdi.fr/rails/active_storage/blobs/eyJfcmFpbHMiOnsibWVzc2FnZSI6IkJBaHBBdWNEIiwiZXhwIjpudWxsLCJwdXIiOiJibG9iX2lkIn19--cba820767d3a989866955f80d9060b9bba70f6d8/wp95_collier_web.pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:fdi:wpaper:1477

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from FERDI Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Vincent Mazenod ().