Does methodology matter?: how should it be practiced?

Bruce J. Caldwell
Additional contact information
Bruce J. Caldwell: University of North Carolina

Finnish Economic Papers, 1990, vol. 3, issue 1, 64-71

Abstract: In the first section five criticisms of methodological work are presented and analyzed. It is argued that, though many of the objections contain elements of truth, the study of methodology is still a worthwhile activity. In the next section three alternative approaches to the practice of methodology are critically evaluated. In the conclusion the author discusses the future direction of his own work.

Date: 1990
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (9)

Downloads: (external link)
http://taloustieteellinenyhdistys.fi/images/stories/fep/f1990_1g.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:fep:journl:v:3:y:1990:i:1:p:67-71

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Finnish Economic Papers from Finnish Economic Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Editorial Secretary ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).