Financialisation and the Financial and Economic Crises: The Case of Portugal

Sergio Lagoa, Emanuel Leao, Ricardo Mamede and Ricardo Barradas
Additional contact information
Sergio Lagoa: Instituto Universitário de Lisboa – ISCTE and Dinamia’Cet-IUL
Emanuel Leao: Instituto Universitário de Lisboa – ISCTE and Dinamia’Cet-IUL
Ricardo Barradas: Instituto Universitário de Lisboa – ISCTE and Dinamia’Cet-IUL

FESSUD studies from Financialisation, Economy, Society & Sustainable Development (FESSUD) Project

Abstract: The notion of 'financialisation' broadly refers to the growing weight of finance in contemporary economies. Taking this into account, the present study focus on the long-run macroeconomic development and recent financial and economic crisis of the Portuguese economy. Contrary to Greece, Ireland, and Spain, the dismal performance of the Portuguese economy is not solely a post-subprime crisis phenomenon. The sharp discontinuity in GDP growth around the turn of the century is a distinctive feature of Portugal in the EU context and, although several factors account for this discontinuity, the process of financialisation of the Portuguese economy is an essential part of the explanation. This process in Portugal was essentially characterised by a large increase in bank credit to the private sector, resulting from a combination of demand- and supply-side factors that produced a wide availability of credit at historically low interest rates. Thus, we suggest that the Portuguese experience can be labelled a ‘debt-led domestic demand growth’ model. However, after 2000 the Portuguese economy experienced a succession of shocks, and an exhaustion of the domestic debt-led growth at a much earlier stage than other countries, resulting in a sharp economic slowdown, with negative consequences for public finances. The high levels of public and private indebtedness were a decisive factor behind the steep rise in the Portuguese sovereign bonds interest rates between 2010 and 2012. Finally, we assess the impact of financialisation in the current account, investment, consumption, and inequality; articulating these domains with the general growth model. Our conclusion is that the increase in the importance of finance ended having a clear negative impact on the three former domains, while the negative impact on income inequality was less pronounced.

Keywords: Portugal; financialisation; credit; economic growth; investment; consumption; trade balance; income inequality; financial and economic crisis (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: E00 G01 O11 O16 O52 P16 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 79 pages
Date: 2014-12-01
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-fdg and nep-mac
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (9)

Downloads: (external link)
http://fessud.eu/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/FESSUD ... l-final-study-24.pdf Full text (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:fes:fstudy:fstudy24

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in FESSUD studies from Financialisation, Economy, Society & Sustainable Development (FESSUD) Project FESSUD Co-ordinator (Malcolm Sawyer) Leeds University Business School Maurice Keyworth Buidling Leeds LS2 9JT.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Helen Evans ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).