Why did income growth vary across states during the Great Depression?

Thomas Garrett and David Wheelock

No 2005-013, Working Papers from Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Abstract: State per capita incomes became more disperse during the contraction phase of the Great Depression, and less disperse during the recovery phase. We investigate the effects of spatial dependence, industrial composition, bank failures and fiscal policies on state income growth during each phase. We find that industrial composition and spatial interdependencies contributed to negative state income growth during the contraction, whereas New Deal spending contributed to positive state income growth during the recovery phase. We find no evidence that differences in bank failure rates or state government expenditures contributed to variation in state income growth rates.

Keywords: Depressions (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2006
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-his and nep-mac
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (7)

Published in Journal of Economic History, June 2006, 66(2), pp. 456-66

Downloads: (external link)
https://s3.amazonaws.com/real.stlouisfed.org/wp/2005/2005-013.pdf Full text (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Why Did Income Growth Vary Across States During the Great Depression? (2006)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:fip:fedlwp:2005-013

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from

DOI: 10.20955/wp.2005.013

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Scott St. Louis ().