How to advance theory with structural VARs: use the Sims-Cogley-Nason approach

Patrick Kehoe

No 379, Staff Report from Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis

Abstract: The common approach to evaluating a model in the structural VAR literature is to compare the impulse responses from structural VARs run on the data to the theoretical impulse responses from the model. The Sims-Cogley-Nason approach instead compares the structural VARs run on the data to identical structural VARs run on data from the model of the same length as the actual data. Chari, Kehoe, and McGrattan (2006) argue that the inappropriate comparison made by the common approach is the root of the problems in the SVAR literature. In practice, the problems can be solved simply. Switching from the common approach to the Sims-Cogley-Nason approach basically involves changing a few lines of computer code and a few lines of text. This switch will vastly increase the value of the structural VAR literature for economic theory.

Keywords: Econometrics (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2006
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cba, nep-ecm, nep-ets and nep-mac
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (10)

Published in NBER Macroeconomics Annual 2006

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.minneapolisfed.org/research/sr/sr379.pdf Full Text (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: How to Advance Theory with Structural VARs: Use the Sims-Cogley-Nason Approach (2006)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:fip:fedmsr:379

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Staff Report from Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Kate Hansel ().