Transition to FDI openness: reconciling theory and evidence

Ellen McGrattan

No 454, Staff Report from Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis

Abstract: Empirical studies quantifying the economic effects of increased foreign direct investment (FDI) have not provided conclusive evidence that they are positive, as theory predicts. This paper shows that the lack of empirical evidence is consistent with theory if countries are in transition to FDI openness. Anticipated welfare gains lead to temporary declines in domestic investment and employment. Also, growth measures miss some intangible FDI, which is expensed from company profits. The reconciliation of theory and evidence is accomplished with a multicountry dynamic general equilibrium model parameterized with data from a sample of 104 countries during 1980?2005. Although no systematic benefits of FDI openness are found, the model demonstrates that the eventual gains in growth and welfare can be huge, especially for small countries.

Date: 2012
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-dge, nep-fdg and nep-opm
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (10)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.minneapolisfed.org/research/sr/sr454.pdf
http://www.minneapolisfed.org/publications_papers/pub_display.cfm?id=4617 (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Transition to FDI Openness: Reconciling Theory and Evidence (2012)
Working Paper: Transition to FDI Openness: Reconciling Theory and Evidence (2011)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:fip:fedmsr:454

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Staff Report from Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Kate Hansel ().