Switching costs and adverse selection in the market for credit cards: new evidence

Paul S. Calem, Michael Gordy and Loretta Mester

No 05-16, Working Papers from Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia

Abstract: To explain persistence of credit card interest rates at relatively high levels, Calem and Mester (AER, 1995) argued that informational barriers create switching costs for high-balance customers. As evidence, using data from the 1989 Survey of Consumer Finances, they showed that these households were more likely to be rejected when applying for new credit. In this paper, they revisit the question using the 1998 and 2001 SCF. Further, they use new information on card interest rates to test for pricing effects consistent with information-based switching costs. The authors find that informational barriers to competition persist, although their role may have declined. ; Also issued as Payment Cards Center Discussion Paper No. 05-09

Keywords: Credit; cards (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2005
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-com and nep-fmk
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (8)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.philadelphiafed.org/-/media/frbp/asset ... ers/2005/wp05-16.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Switching costs and adverse selection in the market for credit cards: New evidence (2006)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:fip:fedpwp:05-16

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Beth Paul ().