Can the standard international business cycle model explain the relation between trade and comovement?
Ayhan Kose and
Kei-Mu Yi
No 05-3, Working Papers from Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia
Abstract:
Recent empirical research finds that pairs of countries with stronger trade linkages tend to have more highly correlated business cycles. We assess whether the standard international business cycle framework can replicate this intuitive result. We employ a three-country model with transportation costs. We simulate the effects of increased goods market integration under two asset market structures: complete markets and international financial autarky. Our main finding is that under both asset market structures the model can generate stronger correlations for pairs of countries that trade more, but the increased correlation falls far short of the empirical findings. Even when we control for the fact that most country pairs are small with respect to the rest of the world, the model continues to fall short. We also conduct additional simulations that allow for increased trade with the third country or increased TFP shock comovement to affect the country pair?s business cycle comovement. These simulations are helpful in highlighting channels that could narrow the gap between the empirical findings and the predictions of the model.
Keywords: Business cycles; International trade (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2005
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cmp, nep-dge, nep-int and nep-mac
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (9)
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.philadelphiafed.org/-/media/frbp/asset ... pers/2005/wp05-3.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
Journal Article: Can the standard international business cycle model explain the relation between trade and comovement? (2006) 
Working Paper: Can the Standard International Business Cycle Model Explain the Relation Between Trade and Comovement? (2005) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:fip:fedpwp:05-3
Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Beth Paul ().