Monitoring Versus Bonding: Shareholder Rights and Management Compensation

Robert L. Lippert and William T. Moore

Financial Management, 1995, vol. 24, issue 3

Abstract: Using a sample of nearly 700 firms, we documented a significant level of substitution between monitoring efforts by shareholders and bonding of Chief Executive Officers' (CEO)compensation with shareholder wealth. Direct shareholder monitoring effectiveness is measured by various dimensions of voting rights, e.g., equal voting, cumulative voting, and confidential voting. Indirect monitoring is measured by the degree of independence of the board of directors. Bonding of CEO compensation with shareholder wealth is gauged by a new pay-performance sensitivity measure that incorporates volatility in firm value. The results are consistent with prediction of agency theory that compensation contracts are designed to reduce the owner-manager conflict.

Date: 1995
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (15)

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:fma:fmanag:lippert95

Access Statistics for this article

Financial Management is currently edited by Bill Christie

More articles in Financial Management from Financial Management Association University of South Florida 4202 E. Fowler Ave. COBA #3331 Tampa, FL 33620. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Courtney Connors (cconno@coba.usf.edu this e-mail address is bad, please contact repec@repec.org).