Rethinking Participatory Forest Management in Tanzania

Eliezeri Sungusia (), Jens Friis Lund (), Christian Pilegaard Hansen (), Numan Amanzi (), Yonika M. Ngaga (), Gimbage Mbeyale (), Thorsten Treue () and Henrik Meilby ()
Additional contact information
Eliezeri Sungusia: College of Forestry, Wildlife and Tourism, Sokoine University of Agriculture
Jens Friis Lund: Department of Food and Resource Economics, University of Copenhagen
Christian Pilegaard Hansen: Department of Food and Resource Economics, University of Copenhagen
Numan Amanzi: College of Forestry, Wildlife and Tourism, Sokoine University of Agriculture
Yonika M. Ngaga: College of Forestry, Wildlife and Tourism, Sokoine University of Agriculture
Gimbage Mbeyale: College of Forestry, Wildlife and Tourism, Sokoine University of Agriculture
Thorsten Treue: Department of Food and Resource Economics, University of Copenhagen
Henrik Meilby: Department of Food and Resource Economics, University of Copenhagen

No 2020/02, IFRO Working Paper from University of Copenhagen, Department of Food and Resource Economics

Abstract: Around 20 years ago, Tanzania adopted the policy of participatory forest management (PFM) to create incentives for increasing villagers’ participation in forest management. The timing is thus fitting to reflect on the achievements and challenges of the PFM process so far. There have certainly been successes. Nonetheless, challenges remain. Notably, there is a mismatch between participation ideals and the way the process has been framed, or structured, as well as outcomes on the ground in terms of actual participation and forest management practices. This working paper presents experiences with PFM from a handful of sites across the country, relying on existing published literature as well as our own research experiences. Having been involved in a number of major PFM research projects in Tanzania, we, the authors, have a combined experience of more than 20 years of conducting research in this field. We summarize important findings that explain the observed chasm between participation ideals and local realities and offer some recommendations. While some of our diagnoses and recommendations may contradict conventional wisdom in forestry, we believe that this report contributes valuable insights to the continued efforts to further sustainable forestry in Tanzania. We begin by outlining the global ideals of participatory forestry. We then present an overview of the realities of PFM as they appear in existing research. We do not attempt an exhaustive survey of literature or our own research. Rather, we emphasize issues concerning the framing of PFM as a bureaucratic and scientific project, and how that shapes it in practice. We then present case studies illustrating some of the core problems with PFM before concluding with some general recommendations for improving participatory forestry policy and guidelines.

Keywords: Forestry; Planning; Participation; Inventory; Tenure; CBFM; PFM; Africa; Tanzania (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 O21 Q15 Q23 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 25 pages
Date: 2020-02
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-agr, nep-env and nep-ppm
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
http://okonomi.foi.dk/workingpapers/WPpdf/WP2020/IFRO_WP_2020_02.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:foi:wpaper:2020_02

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in IFRO Working Paper from University of Copenhagen, Department of Food and Resource Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Geir Tveit ().