WTO dispute settlement cases involving the agreement on agriculture, 1995–2019

Joseph W. Glauber and Xiaorong Xing

No 1917, IFPRI discussion papers from International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI)

Abstract: A landmark achievement of the Uruguay Round, and notably, the Agreement on Agriculture, was the full inclusion of agriculture in multilateral rules and disciplines. Since the birth of World Trade Organization (WTO), a significant number of member countries have used the dispute settlement mechanism (DSM) for resolving the disputes in agriculture. The DSM has played an important role not only for those parties involved in the disputes, but also by helping member countries to better understand the WTO rules, and therefore help guide them in developing domestic policies and trade policies that are consistent with WTO requirements. This paper examines trade disputes involving the Agreement on Agriculture since the WTO was formed in 1995 through December 2019. It analyzes who brought the disputes and against whom disputes were brought, and provides details on the natures of the disputes, the duration of disputes, and, the outcome of those disputes.

Keywords: agriculture; trade policies; wto; trade; trade agreements; dispute settlement (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-agr and nep-int
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://hdl.handle.net/10568/143498

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:fpr:ifprid:1917

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in IFPRI discussion papers from International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by (ifpri-library@cgiar.org).