Measuring empowerment across the value chain: The evolution of the project-level Women’s Empowerment Index for Market Inclusion (pro-WEAI+MI)
Hazel J. Malapit,
Jessica Heckert,
Adegbola, Patrice Ygué,
Geraud Fabrice Crinot,
Sarah Eissler,
Simone Faas,
Geoffroy Gantoli,
Kenan Kalagho,
Elena M. Martinez,
Ruth S. Meinzen-Dick,
Grace Mswero,
Emily Myers,
Diston Mzungu,
Audrey Pereira,
Crossley Pinkstaff,
Agnes R. Quisumbing,
Catherine Ragasa,
Deborah Rubin,
Greg Seymour,
Salauddin Tauseef and
Market Inclusion Study Team Gaap2
No 2172, IFPRI discussion papers from International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI)
Abstract:
Many development agencies design and implement interventions that aim to reach, benefit, and empower rural women across the value chain in activities ranging from production, to processing, to marketing. Determining whether and how such interventions empower women, as well as the constraints faced by different value chain actors, requires quantitative and qualitative tools. We describe how we adapted the project-level Women’s Empowerment in Agricultural Index (pro-WEAI), a mixed-methods tool for studying empowerment in development projects, to include aspects of agency relevant for multiple types of value chain actors. The resulting pro-WEAI for market inclusion (pro-WEAI+MI) includes quantitative and qualitative instruments developed over the course of four studies. Studies in the Philippines (2017), Bangladesh (2017), and Malawi (2019) were intended to diagnose areas of disempowerment to inform programming, whereas the Benin (2019) study was an impact assessment of an agricultural training program. The pro-WEAI+MI includes all indicators included in pro-WEAI, plus a dashboard of complementary indicators and recommended qualitative instruments. These tools investigate the empowerment of women in different value chains and nodes and identify barriers to market access and inclusion that may restrict empowerment for different value chain actors. Our findings highlight three lessons. First, the sampling strategy needs to be designed to capture the key actors in a value chain. Second, the market inclusion indicators cannot stand alone; they must be interpreted alongside the core pro-WEAI indicators. Third, not all market inclusion indicators will be relevant for all value chains and contexts. Users should research the experiences of women and men in the target value chains in the context of the programto select priority market inclusion indicators.
Keywords: value chains; women's empowerment; gender; agriculture; market access; rural areas; women; Philippines; Bangladesh; Malawi; Benin; South-eastern Asia; Asia; Southern Asia; Southern Africa; Sub-Saharan Africa; Africa; Western Africa; Eastern Africa (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-des, nep-ppm and nep-sea
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://hdl.handle.net/10568/140332
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:fpr:ifprid:2172
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in IFPRI discussion papers from International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().