Assessing the Market Impacts of the Common Agricultural Policy: Does Farmers' Risk Attitude Matter?
Alexandre Gohin and
Yu Zheng
FOODSECURE Working papers from LEI Wageningen UR
Abstract:
Recent models assessing the market impacts of Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) reforms are mostly static, non-stochastic and do not account for the risk attitude of farmers. This paper is a first attempt to fill this gap. We develop a stochastic version of GTAP-AGR model in which we introduce exogenous productivity shocks and farmers' attitude towards risks. In addition to the expectation on mean price, the expectation on price volatility also becomes one of the key factors for the farmers' decisions through its influence on risk premium. We show that under the endogenous modeling of the CAP instruments, risk aversion leads to larger production and price effects. The impacts are even larger if wealth effect is taken into consideration.
JEL-codes: Q17 Q18 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 38
Date: 2016-05
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-agr
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://www3.lei.wur.nl/FoodSecurePublications/46_G ... ulation_complete.pdf (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 500 Can't connect to www3.lei.wur.nl:80 (A connection attempt failed because the connected party did not properly respond after a period of time, or established connection failed because connected host has failed to respond.)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:fsc:fspubl:46
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in FOODSECURE Working papers from LEI Wageningen UR Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Barbara van der Hout ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).