Deterrence in sequential contests: An experimental study

Arthur Nelson

Working Papers from Department of Economics, Florida State University

Abstract: Many contests are sequential, with leaders making decisions rst, and followers observing those decisions and responding to them. The theory predicts that, unlike in standard Stackelberg duopoly settings, in two-player sequential contests the leader has no strategic advantage. However, this is no longer the case for sequential contests with multiple leaders. Applications include political competition with two established parties and a possibility for a third party entry, or R&D competition with multiple incumbents and a new entrant. We conduct a lab experiment testing the equilibrium predictions for two- and three-player sequential contests, with the corresponding simultaneous contests as controls. Consistent with theory, we find evidence of entry deterrence by leaders in the three-player sequential contest, but not in the two-player version.

Keywords: contest; sequential move; Stackelberg; deterrence; experiment (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C92 D72 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 27
Date: 2019-11
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cdm, nep-com, nep-exp and nep-ore
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://coss.fsu.edu/econpapers/wpaper/wp2019_11_02.pdf First version, 2019-11

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:fsu:wpaper:wp2019_11_02

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from Department of Economics, Florida State University Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Luke Rodgers ().