EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Reinventing Detroit: Reclaiming Grayfields—New Metrics in Evaluating Urban Environments

Jon Burley, Gina Deyoung, Shawn Partin and Jason Rokos
Additional contact information
Jon Burley: School of Planning Design and Construction, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48823, USA
Gina Deyoung: School of Planning Design and Construction, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48823, USA
Shawn Partin: School of Planning Design and Construction, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48823, USA
Jason Rokos: School of Planning Design and Construction, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48823, USA

Challenges, 2011, vol. 2, issue 4, 1-10

Abstract: Planners, designers, citizens, and governmental agencies are interested in creating environments that are sustainable and fulfill a wide range of economic, ecological, aesthetic, functional, and cultural expectations for stakeholders. There are numerous approaches and proposals to create such environments. One vision is the 1934 “Broadacre City” proposed by Frank Lloyd Wright for the Taliesin, Wisconsin area that was never implemented. Frank Lloyd Wright’s vision integrated transportation, housing, commercial, agricultural, and natural areas in a highly diverse pattern forming a vast urban savanna complex. He also applied his “Broadacre City” idea to the 1942 Cooperative Homesteads Community Project in Detroit, Michigan, another un-built project. This vision concerning the composition of the urban environment may be conceptually realized in the ongoing gray-field reclamation in suburban Detroit, Michigan. Recent science-based investigations, concerning the metrics to measure and evaluate the quality of designed spaces, suggest that this “Broadacre City” approach may have great merit and is highly preferred over past spatial treatments (p ≤ 0.05). These metrics explain 67 to 80% of the variance concerning stakeholder expectations and are highly definitive (p

Keywords: landscape planning; landscape urbanism; landscape architecture (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: A00 C00 Z00 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2011
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2078-1547/2/4/45/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2078-1547/2/4/45/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jchals:v:2:y:2011:i:4:p:45-54:d:14166

Access Statistics for this article

Challenges is currently edited by Ms. Karen Sun

More articles in Challenges from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-04-18
Handle: RePEc:gam:jchals:v:2:y:2011:i:4:p:45-54:d:14166