Key Targets for Improving Algal Biofuel Production

Gareth Griffiths, Abul Kalam Hossain, Vikas Sharma and Ganesh Duraisamy
Additional contact information
Gareth Griffiths: Energy and Bioproducts Research Institute (EBRI), College of Engineering and Physical Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham B4-7ET, UK
Abul Kalam Hossain: Energy and Bioproducts Research Institute (EBRI), College of Engineering and Physical Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham B4-7ET, UK
Vikas Sharma: Energy and Bioproducts Research Institute (EBRI), College of Engineering and Physical Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham B4-7ET, UK
Ganesh Duraisamy: Internal Combustion Engineering Division, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Anna University, Chennai 600-025, India

Clean Technol., 2021, vol. 3, issue 4, 1-32

Abstract: A number of technological challenges need to be overcome if algae are to be utilized for commercial fuel production. Current economic assessment is largely based on laboratory scale up or commercial systems geared to the production of high value products, since no industrial scale plant exits that are dedicated to algal biofuel. For macroalgae (‘seaweeds’), the most promising processes are anaerobic digestion for biomethane production and fermentation for bioethanol, the latter with levels exceeding those from sugar cane. Currently, both processes could be enhanced by increasing the rate of degradation of the complex polysaccharide cell walls to generate fermentable sugars using specifically tailored hydrolytic enzymes. For microalgal biofuel production, open raceway ponds are more cost-effective than photobioreactors, with CO 2 and harvesting/dewatering costs estimated to be ~50% and up to 15% of total costs, respectively. These costs need to be reduced by an order of magnitude if algal biodiesel is to compete with petroleum. Improved economics could be achieved by using a low-cost water supply supplemented with high glucose and nutrients from food grade industrial wastewater and using more efficient flocculation methods and CO 2 from power plants. Solar radiation of not <3000 h·yr ?1 favours production sites 30° north or south of the equator and should use marginal land with flat topography near oceans. Possible geographical sites are discussed. In terms of biomass conversion, advances in wet technologies such as hydrothermal liquefaction, anaerobic digestion, and transesterification for algal biodiesel are presented and how these can be integrated into a biorefinery are discussed.

Keywords: biofuels; microalgae; macroalgae; biomethane; bioethanol; biohydrogen; biodiesel; bio-oil; hydrothermal liquefaction; anaerobic digestion (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2571-8797/3/4/43/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2571-8797/3/4/43/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jcltec:v:3:y:2021:i:4:p:43-742:d:652777

Access Statistics for this article

Clean Technol. is currently edited by Ms. Shary Song

More articles in Clean Technol. from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().