EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

A Three-Dimensional Radiation Transfer Model to Evaluate Performance of Compound Parabolic Concentrator-Based Photovoltaic Systems

Jingjing Tang, Yamei Yu and Runsheng Tang
Additional contact information
Jingjing Tang: Education Ministry Key Laboratory of Advanced Technology and Preparation for Renewable Energy Materials, Yunnan Normal University, Kunming 650500, China
Yamei Yu: Education Ministry Key Laboratory of Advanced Technology and Preparation for Renewable Energy Materials, Yunnan Normal University, Kunming 650500, China
Runsheng Tang: Education Ministry Key Laboratory of Advanced Technology and Preparation for Renewable Energy Materials, Yunnan Normal University, Kunming 650500, China

Energies, 2018, vol. 11, issue 4, 1-24

Abstract: In the past, two-dimensional radiation transfer models (2-D models) were widely used to investigate the optical performance of linear compound parabolic concentrators (CPCs), in which the radiation transfer on the cross-section of CPC troughs is considered. However, the photovoltaic efficiency of solar cells depends on the real incidence angle instead of the projection incidence angle, thus 2-D models can’t reasonably evaluate the photovoltaic performance of CPC-based photovoltaic systems (CPVs). In this work, three-dimensional radiation transfer (3-D model) within CPC- ? a / ? e , the CPC with a maximum exit angle ? e for radiation within its acceptance angle ( ? a ), is investigated by means of vector algebra, solar geometry and imaging principle of plane mirror, and effects of geometry of CPV- ? a / ? e on its annual electricity generation are studied. Analysis shows that, as compared to similar photovoltaic (PV) panels, the use of CPCs makes the incident angle of solar rays on solar cells increase thus lowers the photovoltaic conversion efficiency of solar cells. Calculations show that, 2-D models can reasonably predict the optical performance of CPVs, but such models always overestimate the photovoltaic performance of CPVs, and even can’t predict the variation trend of annual power output of CPV- ? a / ? e with ? e . Results show that, for full CPV- ? a / ? e with a given ? a , the annual power output increases with ? e first and then comes to a halt as ? e > 83°, whereas for truncated CPV- ? a / ? e with a given geometric concentration ( C t ), the annual power output decreases with ? e .

Keywords: compound parabolic concentrator; concentrating photovoltaic system; three-dimensional radiation transfer; photovoltaic performance; theoretical analysis (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/4/896/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/4/896/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:11:y:2018:i:4:p:896-:d:140589

Access Statistics for this article

Energies is currently edited by Ms. Agatha Cao

More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:11:y:2018:i:4:p:896-:d:140589