Techno-Economic Assessment of Three Modes of Large-Scale Crop Residue Utilization Projects in China

Liang Meng, Ahmed Alengebawy, Ping Ai, Keda Jin, Mengdi Chen and Yulong Pan
Additional contact information
Liang Meng: College of Engineering, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China
Ahmed Alengebawy: College of Engineering, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China
Ping Ai: College of Engineering, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China
Keda Jin: College of Engineering, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China
Mengdi Chen: College of Engineering, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China
Yulong Pan: Wuhan Electronic Information Institute, Wuhan 430019, China

Energies, 2020, vol. 13, issue 14, 1-19

Abstract: In China, the non-exploitation of bioenergy poses major problems and challenges. To solve bioenergy problems, considerable efforts have been made to expedite the construction of large-scale crop residue utilization projects. In this study, three principal supported modes of large-scale crop residue utilization projects were taken as empirical cases in Hubei province bioenergy planning. In terms of the overall benefit and sustainable development, a third-grade evaluation index system was established. The analysis was carried out using the analytical hierarchy process, principal component projection, and grey relational analysis. The conclusion indicates that according to the evaluation values, the sequence from best to worst was crop residue biogas project, crop residue briquette fuel project, and crop residue gasification project. Nevertheless, there was no remarkable difference in the overall evaluation values. The biogas project had certain advantages in terms of the production cost, soil improvement, and expenditure saving, whereas the gasification project was comparatively insufficient in environmental efficiency, product benefit, by-product disposal, and technical rationality. According to actual evaluation results, the unilateral determination approach of the single weight index can be seen as being overcome through the unified adaptation of the evaluation methods. The research results can serve as a reference for making investment decisions to build large-scale crop residue utilization projects.

Keywords: bioenergy projects; crop residue utilization; biogas; AHP; evaluation; decision making (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/14/3729/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/14/3729/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:14:p:3729-:d:386948

Access Statistics for this article

Energies is currently edited by Ms. Agatha Cao

More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().