EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Distributed Power Hardware-in-the-Loop Testing Using a Grid-Forming Converter as Power Interface

Steffen Vogel, Ha Thi Nguyen, Marija Stevic, Tue Vissing Jensen, Kai Heussen, Vetrivel Subramaniam Rajkumar and Antonello Monti
Additional contact information
Steffen Vogel: RWTH Aachen University, 52062 Aachen, Germany
Ha Thi Nguyen: Technical University of Denmark, 2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark
Marija Stevic: RWTH Aachen University, 52062 Aachen, Germany
Tue Vissing Jensen: Technical University of Denmark, 2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark
Kai Heussen: Technical University of Denmark, 2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark
Vetrivel Subramaniam Rajkumar: Delft University of Technology, 2628 CD Delft, The Netherlands
Antonello Monti: RWTH Aachen University, 52062 Aachen, Germany

Energies, 2020, vol. 13, issue 15, 1-24

Abstract: This paper presents an approach to extend the capabilities of smart grid laboratories through the concept of Power Hardware-in-the-Loop (PHiL) testing by re-purposing existing grid-forming converters. A simple and cost-effective power interface, paired with a remotely located Digital Real-time Simulator (DRTS), facilitates Geographically Distributed Power Hardware Loop (GD-PHiL) in a quasi-static operating regime. In this study, a DRTS simulator was interfaced via the public internet with a grid-forming ship-to-shore converter located in a smart-grid testing laboratory, approximately 40 km away from the simulator. A case study based on the IEEE 13-bus distribution network, an on-load-tap-changer (OLTC) controller and a controllable load in the laboratory demonstrated the feasibility of such a setup. A simple compensation method applicable to this multi-rate setup is proposed and evaluated. Experimental results indicate that this compensation method significantly enhances the voltage response, whereas the conservation of energy at the coupling point still poses a challenge. Findings also show that, due to inherent limitations of the converter’s Modbus interface, a separate measurement setup is preferable. This can help achieve higher measurement fidelity, while simultaneously increasing the loop rate of the PHiL setup.

Keywords: geographically distributed real-time simulation; remote power hardware-in-the-Loop; grid-forming converter; hardware-in-the-loop; simulation fidelity; energy-based metric; energy residual; quasi-stationary (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/15/3770/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/15/3770/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:15:p:3770-:d:388104

Access Statistics for this article

Energies is currently edited by Ms. Agatha Cao

More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:15:p:3770-:d:388104