EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Comparing Hydrogen Sulfide Removal Efficiency in a Field-Scale Digester Using Microaeration and Iron Filters

Joanna K. Huertas, Lawrence Quipuzco, Amro Hassanein and Stephanie Lansing
Additional contact information
Joanna K. Huertas: Academic Department of Environmental Engineering, National Agrarian University La Molina, Lima 15024, Peru
Lawrence Quipuzco: Academic Department of Environmental Engineering, National Agrarian University La Molina, Lima 15024, Peru
Amro Hassanein: Department of Environmental Science and Technology, University of Maryland, 1429 Animal Sci./Ag Engineering Bldg., College Park, MD 20742, USA
Stephanie Lansing: Department of Environmental Science and Technology, University of Maryland, 1429 Animal Sci./Ag Engineering Bldg., College Park, MD 20742, USA

Energies, 2020, vol. 13, issue 18, 1-14

Abstract: Biological desulfurization of biogas from a field-scale anaerobic digester in Peru was tested using air injection (microaeration) in separate duplicate vessels and chemical desulfurization using duplicate iron filters to compare hydrogen sulfide (H 2 S) reduction, feasibility, and cost. Microaeration was tested after biogas retention times of 2 and 4 h after a single injection of ambient air at 2 L/min. The microaeration vessels contained digester sludge to seed sulfur-oxidizing bacteria and facilitate H 2 S removal. The average H 2 S removal efficiency using iron filters was 32.91%, with a maximum of 70.21%. The average H 2 S removal efficiency by iron filters was significantly lower than microaeration after 2 and 4 h retention times (91.5% and 99.8%, respectively). The longer retention time (4 h) resulted in a higher average removal efficiency (99.8%) compared to 2 h (91.5%). The sulfur concentration in the microaeration treatment vessel was 493% higher after 50 days of treatments, indicating that the bacterial community present in the liquid phase of the vessels effectively sequestered the sulfur compounds from the biogas. The H 2 S removal cost for microaeration (2 h: $29/m 3 H 2 S removed; and 4 h: $27/m 3 H 2 S removed) was an order of magnitude lower than for the iron filter ($382/m 3 H 2 S removed). In the small-scale anaerobic digestion system in Peru, microaeration was more efficient and cost effective for desulfurizing the biogas than the use of iron filters.

Keywords: desulfurization; anaerobic digestion; biogas; sulfur-oxidizing bacteria; H 2 S (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/18/4793/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/18/4793/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:18:p:4793-:d:413325

Access Statistics for this article

Energies is currently edited by Ms. Agatha Cao

More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:18:p:4793-:d:413325