EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Hybrid Fuel Cell—Supercritical CO 2 Brayton Cycle for CO 2 Sequestration-Ready Combined Heat and Power

Rhushikesh Ghotkar, Ellen B. Stechel, Ivan Ermanoski and Ryan J. Milcarek
Additional contact information
Rhushikesh Ghotkar: School for Engineering of Matter, Transport and Energy, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-6106, USA
Ellen B. Stechel: ASU LightWorks ® and School of Molecular Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-5402, USA
Ivan Ermanoski: ASU LightWorks ® and School of Sustainability, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-5402, USA
Ryan J. Milcarek: School for Engineering of Matter, Transport and Energy, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-6106, USA

Energies, 2020, vol. 13, issue 19, 1-20

Abstract: The low prices and its relatively low carbon intensity of natural gas have encouraged the coal replacement with natural gas power generation. Such a replacement reduces greenhouse gases and other emissions. To address the significant energy penalty of carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) sequestration in gas turbine systems, a novel high efficiency concept is proposed and analyzed, which integrates a flame-assisted fuel cell (FFC) with a supercritical CO 2 (sCO 2 ) Brayton cycle air separation. The air separation enables the exhaust from the system to be CO 2 sequestration-ready. The FFC provides the heat required for the sCO 2 cycle. Heat rejected from the sCO 2 cycle provides the heat required for adsorption-desorption pumping to isolate oxygen via air separation. The maximum electrical efficiency of the FFC sCO 2 turbine hybrid (FFCTH) without being CO 2 sequestration-ready is 60%, with the maximum penalty being 0.68% at a fuel-rich equivalence ratio (Φ) of 2.8, where Φ is proportional to fuel-air ratio. This electrical efficiency is higher than the standard sCO 2 cycle by 6.85%. The maximum power-to-heat ratio of the sequestration-ready FFCTH is 233 at a Φ = 2.8. Even after including the air separation penalty, the electrical efficiency is higher than in previous studies.

Keywords: supercritical CO 2; combined heat and power; flame-assisted fuel cells; carbon sequestration; solid oxide fuel cell (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/19/5043/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/19/5043/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:19:p:5043-:d:419008

Access Statistics for this article

Energies is currently edited by Ms. Agatha Cao

More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:19:p:5043-:d:419008