EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Comparison of Torrefaction and Hydrothermal Treatment as Pretreatment Technologies for Rice Husks

Tianjiao Cheng, Andante Hadi Pandyaswargo and Hiroshi Onoda
Additional contact information
Tianjiao Cheng: Graduate School of Environment and Energy Engineering, Waseda University, Tokyo 162-0041, Japan
Andante Hadi Pandyaswargo: Environmental Research Institute, Waseda University, Tokyo 162-0041, Japan
Hiroshi Onoda: Graduate School of Environment and Energy Engineering, Waseda University, Tokyo 162-0041, Japan

Energies, 2020, vol. 13, issue 19, 1-20

Abstract: Many agricultural waste residues are generated in Southeast Asia while some areas in the region still do not have electricity. This study explores the potential effective utilization of agricultural residues in Southeast Asia to generate power. Firstly, visualization of the potential for energy generation was completed using a geographic information system (GIS). Secondly, a comparison of effectiveness was completed between the torrefaction and hydrothermal treatment of low-grade agricultural residues as pretreatment techniques for the modification of agricultural residues. In this study, the feasibility of utilizing rice residues was analyzed (i.e., rice husks, which are produced in large quantities in Southeast Asia) to determine their suitability for pretreatment as feedstock for power plants. This was assessed experimentally by focusing on the pyrolytic characteristics of the husks and the rate of ash change both before and after treatment, while the subsequent implications on transportation costs were also noted. The results indicated that the percentage of ash in torrefied rice husks was 26.7%, whereas the percentages of ash in rice husks that were treated with water or an NaOH solution were 13.96% and 8.87%, respectively. The reduction in transportation costs after compression was 90.8% for hydrothermal treatment and 88.7% for torrefaction.

Keywords: rice husks; biomass energy; torrefaction; hydrothermal (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/19/5158/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/19/5158/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:19:p:5158-:d:423416

Access Statistics for this article

Energies is currently edited by Ms. Agatha Cao

More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:19:p:5158-:d:423416