EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Evaluation of an Offshore Wind Farm by Using Data from the Weather Station, Floating LiDAR, Mast, and MERRA

Cheng-Dar Yue, Yi-Shegn Chiu, Chien-Cheng Tu and Ta-Hui Lin
Additional contact information
Cheng-Dar Yue: Department of Landscape Architecture, National Chiayi University, No. 300, Syuefu Rd., Chiayi 600, Taiwan
Yi-Shegn Chiu: Department of Landscape Architecture, National Chiayi University, No. 300, Syuefu Rd., Chiayi 600, Taiwan
Chien-Cheng Tu: Research Center for Energy Technology and Strategy, National Cheng Kung University, No.25, Xiaodong Rd., North Dist., Tainan City 704, Taiwan
Ta-Hui Lin: Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Cheng Kung University, No.1, University Road, Tainan City 701, Taiwan

Energies, 2020, vol. 13, issue 1, 1-20

Abstract: Offshore wind energy is regarded as a key alternative to fossil fuels in many parts of the world. Its exploitation is based on the sound evaluation of wind resources. This study used data from a meteorological mast, a floating light detection and ranging (LiDAR) device, and the Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications, a reanalysis data set established by the NASA Center for Climate Simulation, to evaluate wind resources of the Changhua-South Offshore Wind Farm. The average wind speeds evaluated at a height of 105 m in the studied wind farm were 7.97 and 8.02 m/s according to the data obtained from the floating LiDAR device and a mast, respectively. The full-load hours were 3320.5 and 3296.5 h per year when data from the LiDAR device and mast were used, respectively. The estimated annual energy production (AEP) with a probability of 50% ( P 50 ) reached 314 GWh/y, whereas the AEPs with a probability of 75% ( P 75 ) and with a probability of 90% ( P 90 ) were 283 GWh/y and 255 GWh/y, respectively. The estimated AEP of P 75 was 90% of the AEP of P 50 , whereas the estimated AEP of P 90 was 81% of the AEP of P 50 . This difference might need to be considered when assessing the risk of financing a wind project.

Keywords: meteorological mast; floating LiDAR; MERRA; energy production prediction (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/1/185/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/1/185/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:1:p:185-:d:304004

Access Statistics for this article

Energies is currently edited by Ms. Agatha Cao

More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:1:p:185-:d:304004