Energy Saving through Efficient BOG Prediction and Impact of Static Boil-off-Rate in Full Containment-Type LNG Storage Tank
Mohd Shariq Khan,
Muhammad Abdul Qyyum,
Wahid Ali,
Aref Wazwaz,
Khursheed B. Ansari and
Moonyong Lee
Additional contact information
Mohd Shariq Khan: Department of Chemical Engineering, College of Engineering, Dhofar University, Salalah 211, Oman
Muhammad Abdul Qyyum: Department of Chemical Engineering, Yeungnam University, Dae-dong 712-749, Korea
Wahid Ali: Department of Chemical Engineering Technology, College of Applied Industrial Technology (CAIT), Jazan University, Jazan 45142, Saudi Arabia
Aref Wazwaz: Department of Chemical Engineering, College of Engineering, Dhofar University, Salalah 211, Oman
Khursheed B. Ansari: Department of Chemical Engineering, Zakir Husain College of Engineering and Technology, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh 202001, India
Moonyong Lee: Department of Chemical Engineering, Yeungnam University, Dae-dong 712-749, Korea
Energies, 2020, vol. 13, issue 21, 1-14
Abstract:
Boil-off gas (BOG) from a liquefied natural gas (LNG) storage tank depends on the amount of heat leakage however, its assessment often relies on the static value of the boil-off rate (BOR) suggested by the LNG tank vendors that over/under predicts BOG generation. Thus, the impact of static BOR on BOG predictions is investigated and the results suggest that BOR is a strong function of liquid level in a tank. Total heat leakage in a tank practically remains constant, nonetheless the unequal distribution of heat in vapor and liquid gives variation in BOR. Assigning the total tank heat leak to the liquid is inappropriate since a part of heat increases vapor temperature. At the lower liquid level, BOG is under-predicted and at a higher level, it is over-predicted using static BOR. Simulation results show that BOR varies from 0.012 wt% per day for an 80% tank fill to 0.12 wt% per day at 10% tank fill.
Keywords: natural gas; liquefaction; regasification; LNG storage tank; BOG; BOR (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/21/5578/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/21/5578/ (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:21:p:5578-:d:434656
Access Statistics for this article
Energies is currently edited by Ms. Agatha Cao
More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().