Residential Buildings’ Foundations as a Ground Heat Exchanger and Comparison among Different Types in a Moderate Climate Country

Lazaros Aresti, Paul Christodoulides, Gregoris P. Panayiotou and Georgios Florides
Additional contact information
Lazaros Aresti: Department of Electrical Engineering, Computer Engineering and Informatics, Cyprus University of Technology, P.O. Box 50329, 3603 Limassol, Cyprus
Paul Christodoulides: Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Cyprus University of Technology, P.O. Box 50329, 3603 Limassol, Cyprus
Gregoris P. Panayiotou: Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Cyprus University of Technology, P.O. Box 50329, 3603 Limassol, Cyprus
Georgios Florides: Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Cyprus University of Technology, P.O. Box 50329, 3603 Limassol, Cyprus

Energies, 2020, vol. 13, issue 23, 1-22

Abstract: Shallow Geothermal Energy Systems (SGESs) constitute Renewable Energy Systems (RES), which find application in the residential sector through the use of Ground Source Heat Pumps (GSHPs). GSHPs are associated with Ground Heat Exchangers (GHEs), whereby heat is gained/lost through a network of tubes into the ground. GSHPs have failed to flourish in the RES market due to their high initial costs and long payback periods. In this study, the use of Energy Geo-Structure (EGS) systems, namely, the foundation (or energy) piles and the foundation bed of a residential building in Cyprus, was computationally modeled in the COMSOL Multiphysics software. First, the single-houses’ trend in number of units and area in Cyprus was examined and a theoretically typical house with nearly Zero Energy Building (nZEB) characteristics was considered. The heating and cooling loads were estimated in the TRNSYS software environment and used as inputs to investigate the performance of the GSHP/GHE systems. Both systems were shown to exhibit steady performance and high Coefficient of Performance (COP) values, making them an alternative RES solution for residential building integration. Next, the systems were economically evaluated through a comparison with a convectional Air Source Heat Pump (ASHP) system. The economic analysis showed that the cost of the suggested conversions of the foundation elements into GHEs had short payback periods. Consequently, either using the foundation piles or bed as a GHE is a profitable investment and an alternative to conventional RES.

Keywords: ground heat exchanger; thermo active structures; energy geo structures; foundation GHE; energy piles; foundation bed GHE (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/23/6287/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/23/6287/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:23:p:6287-:d:453073

Access Statistics for this article

Energies is currently edited by Ms. Agatha Cao

More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().