Validation Process for Rooftop Wind Regime CFD Model in Complex Urban Environment Using an Experimental Measurement Campaign

Sarah Jamal Mattar, Mohammad Reza Kavian Nezhad, Michael Versteege, Carlos F. Lange and Brian A. Fleck
Additional contact information
Sarah Jamal Mattar: Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 1H9, Canada
Mohammad Reza Kavian Nezhad: Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 1H9, Canada
Michael Versteege: Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 1H9, Canada
Carlos F. Lange: Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 1H9, Canada
Brian A. Fleck: Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 1H9, Canada

Energies, 2021, vol. 14, issue 9, 1-19

Abstract: This research presents a validation methodology for computational fluid dynamics (CFD) assessments of rooftop wind regime in urban environments. A case study is carried out at the Donadeo Innovation Centre for Engineering building at the University of Alberta campus. A numerical assessment of rooftop wind regime around buildings of the University of Alberta North campus has been performed by using 3D steady Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes equations, on a large-scale high-resolution grid using the ANSYS CFX code. Two methods of standard deviation (SDM) and average (AM) were introduced to compare the numerical results with the corresponding measurements. The standard deviation method showed slightly better agreements between the numerical results and measurements compared to the average method, by showing the average wind speed errors of 10.8% and 17.7%, and wind direction deviation of 8.4° and 12.3°, for incident winds from East and South, respectively. However, the average error between simulated and measured wind speeds of the North and West incidents were 51.2% and 24.6%, respectively. Considering the fact that the upstream geometry was not modeled in detail for the North and West directions, the validation methodology presented in this paper is deemed as acceptable, as good agreement between the numerical and experimental results of East and South incidents were achieved.

Keywords: wind regime; complex urban geometry; experimental measurements; CFD; validation study; turbulent flow; ANSYS CFX (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/9/2497/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/9/2497/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:9:p:2497-:d:544600

Access Statistics for this article

Energies is currently edited by Ms. Agatha Cao

More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().