EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Life Cycle Based Climate Emissions of Charcoal Conditioning Routes for the Use in the Ferro-Alloy Production

Gerrit Ralf Surup, Hamideh Kaffash, Yan Ma, Anna Trubetskaya, Johan Berg Pettersen and Merete Tangstad
Additional contact information
Gerrit Ralf Surup: Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491 Trondheim, Norway
Hamideh Kaffash: Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491 Trondheim, Norway
Yan Ma: Department of Energy and Process Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491 Trondheim, Norway
Anna Trubetskaya: Department of Chemical Sciences, University of Limerick, V94 T9PX Limerick, Ireland
Johan Berg Pettersen: Department of Energy and Process Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491 Trondheim, Norway
Merete Tangstad: Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491 Trondheim, Norway

Energies, 2022, vol. 15, issue 11, 1-28

Abstract: Renewable reductants are intended to significantly reduce CO 2 emissions from ferro-alloy production, e.g., by up to 80% in 2050 in Norway. However, charcoals provide inferior properties compared to fossil fuel-based reductants, which can hamper large replacement ratios. Therefore, conditioning routes from coal beneficiation was investigated to improve the inferior properties of charcoal, such as mechanical strength, volatile matter, CO 2 reactivity and mineral matter content. To evaluate the global warming potential of renewable reductants, the CO 2 emissions of upgraded charcoal were estimated by using a simplified life cycle assessment, focusing on the additional emissions by the energy demand, required chemicals and mass loss for each process stage. The combination of ash removal, briquetting and high-temperature treatment can provide a renewable coke with superior properties compared to charcoal, but concomitantly decrease the available biomass potential by up to 40%, increasing the CO 2 -based global warming potential of industrial produced charcoal to ?500 kg CO 2 -eq. t ? 1 FC. Based on our assumptions, CO 2 emissions from fossil fuel-based reductants can be reduced by up to 85%. A key to minimizing energy or material losses is to combine the pyrolysis and post-treatment processes of renewable reductants to upgrade industrial charcoal on-site at the metallurgical plant. Briquetting showed the largest additional global warming potential from the investigated process routes, whereas the high temperature treatment requires a renewable energy source to be sustainable.

Keywords: charcoal; upgrading; renewable reductants; global warming potential; life cycle assessment (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/11/3933/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/11/3933/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:11:p:3933-:d:824880

Access Statistics for this article

Energies is currently edited by Ms. Agatha Cao

More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:11:p:3933-:d:824880