Planning for a Low Carbon Future? Comparing Heat Pumps and Cogeneration as the Energy System Options for a New Residential Area

Jukka Heinonen, Jani Laine, Karoliina Pluuman, Eeva-Sofia Säynäjoki, Risto Soukka and Seppo Junnila
Additional contact information
Jukka Heinonen: Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Iceland, Hjardarhagi 2-6, 107 Reykjavik, Iceland
Jani Laine: Department of Real Estate, Planning and Geoinformatics, Aalto University, P.O. Box 15800, 00076 Aalto, Finland
Karoliina Pluuman: Department of Real Estate, Planning and Geoinformatics, Aalto University, P.O. Box 15800, 00076 Aalto, Finland
Eeva-Sofia Säynäjoki: Department of Real Estate, Planning and Geoinformatics, Aalto University, P.O. Box 15800, 00076 Aalto, Finland
Risto Soukka: School of Energy Systems, Lappeenranta University of Technology, PL 20, 53851 Lappeenranta, Finland
Seppo Junnila: Department of Real Estate, Planning and Geoinformatics, Aalto University, P.O. Box 15800, 00076 Aalto, Finland

Energies, 2015, vol. 8, issue 9, 1-18

Abstract: The purpose of this paper is to compare, from an urban planning perspective, the choice between combined heat and power (CHP) and a ground-source heat pump (HP) as the energy systems of a new residential area in the light of the uncertainty related to the assessments. There has been a strong push globally for CHP due to its climate mitigation potential compared to separate production, and consequently it is often prioritized in planning without questioning. However, the uncertainties in assessing the emissions from CHP and alternative options in a certain planning situation make it very difficult to give robust decision guidelines. In addition, even the order of magnitude of the climate impact of a certain plan is actually difficult to assess robustly. With a case study of the new residential development of Härmälänranta in Tampere, Finland, we show how strongly the uncertainties related to (1) utilizing average or marginal electricity as the reference; (2) assigning emissions intensities for the production; and (3) allocating the emissions from CHP to heat and electricity affect the results and lead to varying decision guidelines. We also depict how a rather rarely utilized method in assigning the emissions from CHP is the most robust for planning support.

Keywords: urban planning; greenhouse gas; GHG; energy system; heat pump; cogeneration; combined heat and power; CHP; district heat; marginal production (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (9)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/8/9/9137/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/8/9/9137/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:8:y:2015:i:9:p:9137-9154:d:54854

Access Statistics for this article

Energies is currently edited by Ms. Agatha Cao

More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().