Torre?ed Biomass Pellets—Comparing Grindability in Different Laboratory Mills

Jan Hari Arti Khalsa, Diana Leistner, Nadja Weller, Leilani I. Darvell and Ben Dooley
Additional contact information
Jan Hari Arti Khalsa: Deutsches Biomasseforschungszentrum gemeinnützige GmbH, Leipzig 04347, Germany
Diana Leistner: Deutsches Biomasseforschungszentrum gemeinnützige GmbH, Leipzig 04347, Germany
Nadja Weller: Deutsches Biomasseforschungszentrum gemeinnützige GmbH, Leipzig 04347, Germany
Leilani I. Darvell: School of Chemical and Process Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
Ben Dooley: School of Chemical and Process Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK

Energies, 2016, vol. 9, issue 10, 1-15

Abstract: The ?ring and co-?ring of biomass in pulverized coal ?red power plants around the world is expected to increase in the coming years. Torrefaction may prove to be a suitable way of upgrading biomass for such an application. For transport and storage purposes, the torre?ed biomass will tend to be in pellet form. Whilst standard methods for the assessment of the milling characteristics of coal exist, this is not the case for torre?ed materials—whether in pellet form or not. The grindability of the fuel directly impacts the overall ef?ciency of the combustion process and as such it is an important parameter. In the present study, the grindability of different torre?ed biomass pellets was tested in three different laboratory mill types; cutting mill (CM), hammer mill (HM) and impact mill (IM). The speci?c grinding energy (SGE) required for a de?ned mass throughput of pellets in each mill was measured and results were compared to other pellet characterization methods (e.g., durability, and hardness) as well as the modi?ed Hardgrove Index. Seven different torre?ed biomass pellets including willow, pine, beech, poplar, spruce, forest residue and straw were used as feedstock. On average, the particle-size distribution width (across all feedstock) was narrowest for the IM (0.41 mm), followed by the HM (0.51 mm) and widest for the CM (0.62 mm). Regarding the SGE, the IM consumed on average 8.23 Wh/kg while CM and HM consumed 5.15 and 5.24 Wh/kg, respectively. From the three mills compared in this study, the IM seems better ?t for being used in a standardized method that could be developed in the future, e.g., as an ISO standard.

Keywords: grindability; torre?ed biomass; pellet; energy consumption; co-?ring (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/9/10/794/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/9/10/794/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:9:y:2016:i:10:p:794-:d:79825

Access Statistics for this article

Energies is currently edited by Ms. Agatha Cao

More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().