Real-Time Effects of Payer Restrictions on Reproductive Healthcare: A Qualitative Analysis of Cost-Related Barriers and Their Consequences among U.S. Abortion Seekers on Reddit

Jenny A. Higgins, Madison Lands, Taryn M. Valley, Emma Carpenter and Laura Jacques
Additional contact information
Jenny A. Higgins: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53715, USA
Madison Lands: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53715, USA
Taryn M. Valley: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53715, USA
Emma Carpenter: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53715, USA
Laura Jacques: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53715, USA

IJERPH, 2021, vol. 18, issue 17, 1-11

Abstract: Objective: The Hyde Amendment and related policies limit or prohibit Medicaid coverage of abortion services in the United States. Most research on cost-related abortion barriers relies on clinic-based samples, but people who desire abortions may never make it to a healthcare center. To examine a novel, pre-abortion population, we analyzed a unique qualitative dataset of posts from Reddit, a widely used social media platform increasingly leveraged by researchers, to assess financial obstacles among anonymous posters considering abortion. Methods: In February 2020, we used Python to web-scrape the 250 most recent posts that mentioned abortion, removing all identifying information and usernames. After transferring all posts into NVivo, a qualitative software package, the team identified all datapoints related to cost. Three qualitatively trained evaluators established and applied codes, reaching saturation after 194 posts. The research team used a descriptive qualitative approach, using both inductive and deductive elements, to identify and analyze themes related to financial barriers. Results: We documented multiple cost-related deterrents, including lack of funds for both the procedure and attendant travel costs, inability to afford desired abortion modality (i.e., medication or surgical), and for some, consideration of self-managed abortion options due to cost barriers. Conclusions: Findings from this study underscore the centrality of cost barriers and third-party payer restrictions to stymying reproductive health access in the United States. Results may contribute to the growing evidence base and building political momentum focused on repealing the Hyde Amendment.

Keywords: abortion seekers; abortion clinics; abortion (induced); abortion (illegal); Medicaid; third-party payers; social media; reproductive health services; reproductive rights (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/17/9013/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/17/9013/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:17:p:9013-:d:622738

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().