Adopting Safe-by-Design in Science and Engineering Academia: The Soil May Need Tilling

Sam Jan Cees Krouwel, Emma Rianne Dierickx, Sara Heesterbeek and Pim Klaassen
Additional contact information
Sam Jan Cees Krouwel: National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, RIVM, 3720 BA Bilthoven, The Netherlands
Emma Rianne Dierickx: National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, RIVM, 3720 BA Bilthoven, The Netherlands
Sara Heesterbeek: National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, RIVM, 3720 BA Bilthoven, The Netherlands
Pim Klaassen: Athena Institute, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands

IJERPH, 2022, vol. 19, issue 4, 1-17

Abstract: In recent years, Safe-by-Design (SbD) has been launched as a concept that supports science and engineering such that a broad conception of safety is embraced and structurally embedded. The present study explores the extent to which academics in a distinctively relevant subset of science and engineering disciplines are receptive towards the work and teaching practices SbD would arguably imply. Through 29 interviews with researchers in nanotechnology, biotechnology and chemical engineering differences in perceptions of safety, life-cycle thinking and responsibility for safety were explored. Results indicate that although safety is perceived as a paramount topic in scientific practice, its meaning is rigorously demarcated, marking out safety within the work environment. In effect, this creates a limited perceived role responsibility vis-à-vis safety in the production of knowledge and in teaching, with negligible critical consideration of research’s downstream impacts. This is at odds with the adoption of a broader conception of, and responsibility for, safety. The considerations supporting the perceived boundaries demarcating scientific practice are scrutinized. This study suggests that implementing SbD in academia requires systemic changes, the development of new methods, and attention for researchers’ and innovators’ elementary views on the meaning of and responsibility for safety throughout the innovation chain.

Keywords: Safe-by-Design; responsible research and innovation; safe innovation; responsibility; academia; teaching and education (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/4/2075/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/4/2075/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:4:p:2075-:d:748096

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().