Good Care during COVID-19: A Narrative Approach to Care Home Staff’s Experiences of the Pandemic

Marleen D. W. Dohmen, Charlotte van den Eijnde, Christina L. E. Thielman, Jolanda Lindenberg, Johanna M. Huijg and Tineke A. Abma
Additional contact information
Marleen D. W. Dohmen: Leyden Academy on Vitality and Ageing, 2333 AA Leiden, The Netherlands
Charlotte van den Eijnde: Leyden Academy on Vitality and Ageing, 2333 AA Leiden, The Netherlands
Christina L. E. Thielman: Leyden Academy on Vitality and Ageing, 2333 AA Leiden, The Netherlands
Jolanda Lindenberg: Leyden Academy on Vitality and Ageing, 2333 AA Leiden, The Netherlands
Johanna M. Huijg: Leyden Academy on Vitality and Ageing, 2333 AA Leiden, The Netherlands
Tineke A. Abma: Leyden Academy on Vitality and Ageing, 2333 AA Leiden, The Netherlands

IJERPH, 2022, vol. 19, issue 4, 1-16

Abstract: Due to its major impact on Dutch care homes for older people, the COVID-19 pandemic has presented care staff with unprecedented challenges. Studies investigating the experiences of care staff during the COVID-19 pandemic have shown its negative impact on their wellbeing. We aimed to supplement this knowledge by taking a narrative approach. We drew upon 424 personal narratives written by care staff during their work in a Dutch care home during the COVID-19 pandemic. Firstly, our results show that care staff have a relational-moral approach to good care. Residents’ wellbeing is their main focus, which they try to achieve through personal relationships within the triad of care staff–resident–significant others (SOs). Secondly, our results indicate that caregivers experience the COVID-19 mitigation measures as obstructions to relational-moral good care, as they limit residents’ wellbeing, damage the triadic care staff–residents–SOs relationship and leave no room for dialogue about good care. Thirdly, the results show that care staff experiences internal conflict when enforcing the mitigation measures, as the measures contrast with their relational-moral approach to care. We conclude that decisions about mitigation measures should be the result of a dialogic process on multiple levels so that a desired balance between practical good care and relational-moral good care can be determined.

Keywords: COVID-19; mitigation measures; care homes; wellbeing; care ethics; relational care; narratives (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/4/2106/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/4/2106/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:4:p:2106-:d:748430

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().