Sticky Stock Market Analysts
Ibrahim Filiz,
Jan René Judek,
Marco Lorenz and
Markus Spiwoks
Additional contact information
Ibrahim Filiz: Faculty of Business, Ostfalia University of Applied Sciences, Siegfried-Ehlers-Street 1, D-38440 Wolfsburg, Germany
Jan René Judek: Faculty of Business, Ostfalia University of Applied Sciences, Siegfried-Ehlers-Street 1, D-38440 Wolfsburg, Germany
Marco Lorenz: Faculty of Economic Sciences, Georg August University Göttingen, Platz der Göttinger Sieben 3, D-37073 Göttingen, Germany
Markus Spiwoks: Faculty of Business, Ostfalia University of Applied Sciences, Siegfried-Ehlers-Street 1, D-38440 Wolfsburg, Germany
JRFM, 2021, vol. 14, issue 12, 1-27
Abstract:
Technological progress in recent years has made new methods available for making forecasts in a variety of areas. We examine the success of ex-ante stock market forecasts of three major stock market indices, i.e., the German Stock Market Index (DAX), the Dow Jones Industrial Index (DJI), and the Euro Stoxx 50 (SX5E). We test whether the forecasts prove true when they reach their effective dates and are therefore suitable for active investment strategies. We revive the thoughts of the American sociologist William Fielding Ogburn, who argues that forecasters consistently underestimate the variability of the future. In addition, we draw on some contemporary measures of forecast quality (prediction-realization diagram, test of unbiasedness, and Diebold–Mariano test). We reveal that (a) unusual events are underrepresented in the forecasts, (b) the dispersion of the forecasts lags behind that of the actual events, (c) the slope of the regression lines in the prediction-realization diagram is <1, (d) the forecasts are highly biased, and (e) the quality of the forecasts is not significantly better than that of naïve forecasts. The overall behavior of the forecasters can be described as “sticky” because their forecasts adhere too strongly to long-term trends in the indices and are thus characterized by conservatism.
Keywords: stock market forecasting; forecasting bias; variability of reality; conservatism of predictors (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C E F2 F3 G (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/14/12/593/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/14/12/593/ (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:14:y:2021:i:12:p:593-:d:698283
Access Statistics for this article
JRFM is currently edited by Ms. Chelthy Cheng
More articles in JRFM from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().