Credit Card Default Prediction: An Empirical Analysis on Predictive Performance Using Statistical and Machine Learning Methods
Rakshith Bhandary () and
Bidyut Kumar Ghosh
Additional contact information
Rakshith Bhandary: Department of Commerce, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal 567104, Karnataka, India
Bidyut Kumar Ghosh: Department of Commerce, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal 567104, Karnataka, India
JRFM, 2025, vol. 18, issue 1, 1-20
Abstract:
This article compares the predictive capabilities of six models, namely, linear discriminant analysis (LDA), logistic regression (LR), support vector machine (SVM), XGBoost, random forest (RF), and deep neural network (DNN), to predict the default behavior of credit card holders in Taiwan using data from the UCI machine learning database. The Python programming language was used for data analysis. Statistical methods were compared with machine learning algorithms using the confusion matrix measured in metric terms of prediction accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, precision, G-mean, F1 score, ROC, and AUC. The dataset contained 30,000 credit card users’ information, with 6636 default observations and 23,364 nondefault cases. The study results found that modern machine learning methods outperformed traditional statistical methods in terms of predictive performance measured by the F1 score, G-mean, and AUC. Traditional methods like logistic regression were marginally better than linear discriminant analysis and support vector machines in terms of the predictive performance measured by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. In the modern machine learning methods, deep neural network was better in the predictive performance metrics when compared with XGBoost and random forest methods.
Keywords: credit card default; confusion matrix; deep neural network; default prediction; linear discriminant analysis; logistic regression; machine learning; random forest; support vector machine; XGBoost (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C E F2 F3 G (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/18/1/23/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/18/1/23/ (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:18:y:2025:i:1:p:23-:d:1562935
Access Statistics for this article
JRFM is currently edited by Ms. Chelthy Cheng
More articles in JRFM from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().