Farmland Dispute Prevention: The Role of Land Titling, Social Capital and Household Capability

Shunran Wang, Fangping Rao, Xianlei Ma and Xiaoping Shi ()
Additional contact information
Shunran Wang: China Resource & Environment and Development Academy (REDA) and College of Public Administration, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
Fangping Rao: College of Public Administration, Nanjing University of Finance & Economics, Nanjing 210003, China
Xianlei Ma: China Resource & Environment and Development Academy (REDA) and College of Public Administration, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
Xiaoping Shi: China Resource & Environment and Development Academy (REDA) and College of Public Administration, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China

Land, 2022, vol. 11, issue 10, 1-14

Abstract: Disputes over farmland constitute an important challenge for tenure security, economic growth and social stability. Land titling is a theoretically promising policy instrument that can enhance tenure security and reduce the occurrence of farmland disputes in the developing world. However, the impact of land titling on the occurrence of disputes has been found to be highly conditional. Empirical evidence on this issue has been surprisingly limited and has often lacked the consideration of a specific context. In this study, whether land titling affects the incidence of farmland disputes in the context of China is investigated, focusing particularly on the interaction between land titling and social capital and household capability. Both the probit and CLL models are applied, using household data entailing a total of 3693 samples located in rural China. The results show that (1) land titling in China reduces the incidence of farmland disputes, and that (2) the analysis based on interaction terms indicates that households who are disadvantaged in social capital and household capability are more likely to experience fewer disputes. Implications for the government and organizations are as follows: (1) the titling programme should seriously consider the current tenure arrangement. Confirmation of current tenure is recommended over the establishment of a new system to avoid possible institutional shopping and overlapping claims; and (2) land titling, if well implemented, is recommended to redress local power asymmetry and to help vulnerable groups defend their property.

Keywords: farmland disputes; land titling; social capital; household capability (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q15 Q2 Q24 Q28 Q5 R14 R52 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/10/1742/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/10/1742/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:10:p:1742-:d:936354

Access Statistics for this article

Land is currently edited by Ms. Carol Ma

More articles in Land from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().