People’s Attitudes and Emotions towards Different Urban Forest Types in the Berlin Region, Germany

Henry Lippert, Ingo Kowarik and Tanja M. Straka
Additional contact information
Henry Lippert: Department of Ecology, Technische Universität Berlin, D-12165 Berlin, Germany
Ingo Kowarik: Department of Ecology, Technische Universität Berlin, D-12165 Berlin, Germany
Tanja M. Straka: Department of Ecology, Technische Universität Berlin, D-12165 Berlin, Germany

Land, 2022, vol. 11, issue 5, 1-21

Abstract: In an era of urbanization, forests are a key component of the urban green infrastructure, providing multiple benefits to urban residents. While emerging forests on urban wasteland could increase the urban forest area, it is unclear how residents view such novel forest types. In a comparative self-administered online survey, we assessed attitudes and emotions of residents ( n = 299) from the Berlin region, Germany, towards forest types that represent transformation stages from natural to novel forests: (1) natural remnants, (2) silvicultural plantings, (3) park forests and (4) novel wild forests in wastelands. Respondents expressed positive attitudes and emotions towards all forest types, including the novel wild forest. Ratings were most positive towards natural remnants and least positive towards the novel wild forest. The indicated prevalence of non-native trees ( Ailanthus altissima , Robinia pseudoacacia ) did not evoke negative responses. Women and younger people were more positive towards the novel wild forest compared to other respondents, and men were most positive towards natural remnants. Place attachment was positively related to the park forest. Results indicate support for a wide range of forest types, including novel wild forests and non-native tree species, which can be used to expand urban forest areas and enhance opportunities for nature experience in cities.

Keywords: landscape preference; cognitive constructs; human cognition; four natures approach; non-native plant species; shifting baseline syndrome; urban wilderness; urban greenspaces; urban forestry; wild urban woodland (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q15 Q2 Q24 Q28 Q5 R14 R52 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/5/701/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/5/701/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:5:p:701-:d:810791

Access Statistics for this article

Land is currently edited by Ms. Carol Ma

More articles in Land from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().