EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Groundwater Potential Zones Assessment Using Geospatial Models in Semi-Arid Areas of South Africa

Gbenga Olamide Adesola (), Kgabo Humphrey Thamaga, Oswald Gwavava and Benedict Kinshasa Pharoe
Additional contact information
Gbenga Olamide Adesola: Department of Geology, University of Fort Hare, 1 King William’s Town Road, Alice 5700, South Africa
Kgabo Humphrey Thamaga: Department of GIS and Remote Sensing, University of Fort Hare, 1 King William’s Town Road, Alice 5700, South Africa
Oswald Gwavava: Department of Geology, University of Fort Hare, 1 King William’s Town Road, Alice 5700, South Africa
Benedict Kinshasa Pharoe: Department of Geology, University of Fort Hare, 1 King William’s Town Road, Alice 5700, South Africa

Land, 2023, vol. 12, issue 10, 1-20

Abstract: Water resources are under tremendous pressure as a result of the growing demand for water to meet human needs. Hence, it is necessary to delineate groundwater potential zones (GWPZs) to sustainably develop and manage groundwater resources. In this study, the geospatial-based analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and frequency ratio (FR) techniques were used to identify the GWPZs. Seven factors (geology, rainfall, slope, lineament density, soil, drainage density, and land use/land cover), which partially or entirely influence the groundwater potentiality of an area, were accessed separately and later combined to create GWPZ maps. Weights and ranks were assigned to the factors to perform the AHP model using existing knowledge. The FR was performed by calculating the percentage ratio between the dependent variable (boreholes) and the independent variable (factors). The preparation of the contributing factors and the creation of the resulting models was done using ArcGIS 10.8. The final GWPZ maps were classified into five zones: very low, low, moderate, high, and very high. About 80 boreholes in the study area were randomly subset into training and testing datasets; 58% were used for model training, and the remaining 42% were used for validation purposes. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for the GWPZs models were generated, and the areas under the curves (AUC) were calculated. Validation of the models shows that the FR model is more efficient (85.3% accuracy) than the AHP model (83.2% accuracy). The findings show that the AHP and FR models are reliable and can be adopted to characterize GWPZs in arid or semi-arid environments.

Keywords: GIS; groundwater; frequency ratio; ROC; water scarcity (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q15 Q2 Q24 Q28 Q5 R14 R52 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/10/1877/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/10/1877/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:10:p:1877-:d:1254342

Access Statistics for this article

Land is currently edited by Ms. Carol Ma

More articles in Land from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:10:p:1877-:d:1254342