Identify Optimization Type of Rural Settlements Based on “Production–Living–Ecological” Functions and Vitality: A Case Study of a Town in Northern China

Yafeng Zou, Chengfeng Yi, Yufei Rao, Feng Luo, Changhe Lv and Pinqi Wu ()
Additional contact information
Yafeng Zou: College of Environment and Safety Engineering, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350108, China
Chengfeng Yi: College of Environment and Safety Engineering, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350108, China
Yufei Rao: College of Environment and Safety Engineering, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350108, China
Feng Luo: College of Environment and Safety Engineering, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350108, China
Changhe Lv: Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China
Pinqi Wu: College of Environment and Safety Engineering, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350108, China

Land, 2023, vol. 12, issue 10, 1-27

Abstract: Rural settlements are developing in the direction of functional diversification, driven by rapid urbanization, but also leading to a decline in their vitality as a result of the rapid concentration of rural population in cities. Therefore, this study proposed a theoretical framework to refine the optimization approach for rural settlements from the perspective of “production–living–ecological” functions (PLEF) and vitality. Taking a town in the farming–pastoral ecotone in northern China as a case, we evaluated the level of the PLEF of rural settlements. After exploring the functional requirements of villagers, we revealed the vitality of rural settlements based on social network analysis. The Tapio decoupling model was used to identify the optimization type of rural settlements considering the PLEF and vitality. The results showed that the PLEF of rural settlements was higher in areas with flat terrain, convenient transportation, and rich economies. Rural settlements closer to the central town were stronger in vitality. The PLEF of rural settlements was generally correlated with vitality, which means that rural settlements with a higher level of PLEF also had a stronger vitality. Rural settlements were classified into five types: suburban integration, characteristics protection, agglomeration and upgrading, general survival, relocation, and merger, according to the characteristics of a combination of PLEF and vitality. This study contributes to a deeper comprehension of the functional and structural characteristics of rural settlements and will be beneficial in guiding rural spatial reconstruction.

Keywords: rural settlements; “production–living–ecological” functions; vitality; the farming–pastoral ecotone; Tapio decoupling model (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q15 Q2 Q24 Q28 Q5 R14 R52 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/10/1905/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/10/1905/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:10:p:1905-:d:1257142

Access Statistics for this article

Land is currently edited by Ms. Carol Ma

More articles in Land from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().