Transforming Research on Recreational Ecosystem Services into Applications and Governance

Zhifang Wang, Yuqing Jian (), Zhibin Huang, Salman Qureshi, Kexin Cheng, Zhuhui Bai and Qingwen Zhang
Additional contact information
Zhifang Wang: College of Architecture and Landscape Architecture, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
Yuqing Jian: College of Architecture and Landscape Architecture, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
Zhibin Huang: College of Architecture and Landscape Architecture, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
Salman Qureshi: Institute of Geography, Humboldt University of Berlin, Rudower Chaussee 16, 12489 Berlin, Germany
Kexin Cheng: College of Architecture and Landscape Architecture, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
Zhuhui Bai: College of Architecture and Landscape Architecture, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
Qingwen Zhang: College of Architecture and Landscape Architecture, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China

Land, 2023, vol. 12, issue 2, 1-16

Abstract: The science-practice gap has recently been discussed as a critical challenge restricting sustainable growth and development in all facets of our society, including explorations of Recreation Ecosystem Services (RES). To better explore how well the scientific study of RES and its application are connected, this paper aims to synthesize empirical evidence based on an in-depth and systematic literature review. We found that studies of RES have not effectively transformed into the decision-making and long-term planning of our cities. From 2005 to 2020, only 13% of studies referred to specific applications, and about 40% of papers mentioned no applications or practical implications for their research. However, RES research has many potential applications, which can be categorised into six main aspects. In terms of non-spatial improvement: Improved monetary benefits (40%), non-monetary benefits (30%); in terms of spatial improvement: space with high recreational potential or degradation (7%), the relation between supply and demand (7%); and Cross-service governance (16%). After combining the results of various studies, we developed a framework starting from applicable problems and their solutions, which can incorporate the outcomes of RES research while systematically narrowing down the research questions and methods. The framework offers a starting point for further research that can modify and improve in bridging science-practice gaps in RES studies.

Keywords: ecosystem services; cultural ecosystem services; urban ecology; science-practice gap; ecosystem governance; landscape practice (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q15 Q2 Q24 Q28 Q5 R14 R52 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/2/509/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/2/509/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:2:p:509-:d:1073472

Access Statistics for this article

Land is currently edited by Ms. Carol Ma

More articles in Land from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().