Extrapolation of Digital Soil Mapping Approaches for Soil Organic Carbon Stock Predictions in an Afromontane Environment

Jaco Kotzé () and Johan van Tol
Additional contact information
Jaco Kotzé: Department of Soil, Crop, and Climate Sciences, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein 9301, South Africa
Johan van Tol: Department of Soil, Crop, and Climate Sciences, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein 9301, South Africa

Land, 2023, vol. 12, issue 3, 1-18

Abstract: Soil scientists can aid in an essential part of ecological conservation and rehabilitation by quantifying soil properties, such as soil organic carbon (SOC), and is stock (SOCs) SOC is crucial for providing ecosystem services, and, through effective C-sequestration, the effects of climate change can be mitigated. In remote mountainous areas with complex terrain, such as the northern Maloti-Drakensberg in South Africa and Lesotho, direct quantification of stocks or even obtaining sufficient data to construct predictive Digital Soil Mapping (DSM) models is a tedious and expensive task. Extrapolation of DSM model and algorithms from a relatively accessible area to remote areas could overcome these challenges. The aim of this study was to determine if calibrated DSM models for one headwater catchment (Tugela) can be extrapolated without re-training to other catchments in the Maloti-Drakensberg region with acceptable accuracy. The selected models were extrapolated to four different headwater catchments, which included three near the Motete River (M1, M2, and M3) in Lesotho and one in the Vemvane catchment adjacent to the Tugela. Predictions were compared to measured stocks from the soil sampling sites (n = 98) in the various catchments. Results showed that based on the mean results from Universal Kriging (R 2 = 0.66, NRMSE = 0.200, and ρ c = 0.72), least absolute shrinkage and selection operator or LASSO (R 2 = 0.67, NRMSE = 0.191, and ρ c = 0.73) and Regression Kriging with cubist models (R 2 = 0.61, NRMSE = 0.184, and ρ c = 0.65) had the most satisfactory outcome, whereas the soil-land inference models (SoLIM) struggled to predict stocks accurately. Models in the Vemvane performed the worst of all, showing that that close proximity does not necessarily equal good similarity. The study concluded that a model calibrated in one catchment can be extrapolated. However, the catchment selected for calibration should be a good representation of the greater area, otherwise a model might over- or under-predict SOCs. Successfully extrapolating models to remote areas will allow scientists to make predictions to aid in rehabilitation and conservation efforts of vulnerable areas.

Keywords: soil carbon; digital soil mapping; Afromontane; Maloti-Drakensberg (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q15 Q2 Q24 Q28 Q5 R14 R52 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/3/520/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/3/520/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:3:p:520-:d:1075067

Access Statistics for this article

Land is currently edited by Ms. Carol Ma

More articles in Land from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().