EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Land Use Transition and Regional Development Patterns Under Shared Socioeconomic Pathways: Evidence from Prefecture-Level Cities in China

Xiaodong Zhang, Mingjie Yang, Rui Guo, Yaolong Li and Fanglei Zhong ()
Additional contact information
Xiaodong Zhang: Information and Communication Company of State Grid Gansu Electric Power Company, Lanzhou 730000, China
Mingjie Yang: Information and Communication Company of State Grid Gansu Electric Power Company, Lanzhou 730000, China
Rui Guo: Information and Communication Company of State Grid Gansu Electric Power Company, Lanzhou 730000, China
Yaolong Li: School of Economics, Minzu University of China, Beijing 100081, China
Fanglei Zhong: School of Economics, Minzu University of China, Beijing 100081, China

Land, 2025, vol. 14, issue 3, 1-22

Abstract: This study evaluates the spatial–temporal evolution of land use intensity and regional development under five shared socioeconomic pathways (SSPs) through prefecture-level projections in China (2020–2050). This study integrates the population–development–environment model with back propagation (BP) neural networks, a supervised learning algorithm, to analyze how differentiated development trajectories reshape land systems. Results reveal distinct pathways: SSP5 (conventional development) and SSP1 (sustainability) achieve high-income thresholds by 2025/2028 with intensive land development, while SSP3 (fragmentation) risks stagnation post-2037 accompanied by inefficient land use. Spatial analysis identifies persistent dualism across the Hu Huanyong Line—83.6% of urban land expansion concentrates in eastern regions, whereas western areas exhibit 56% lower land productivity. By 2050, regional land use efficiency differentials (0.3–4.3% Gross Domestic Product/capita growth) highlight challenges in balancing urban agglomeration and ecological conservation. These findings provide empirical evidence for optimizing land allocation policies during China’s economic transition.

Keywords: shared socioeconomic pathways; middle-income trap; prefecture city scale; population–development–environment model; BP neural network model; China (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q15 Q2 Q24 Q28 Q5 R14 R52 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/3/454/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/3/454/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:3:p:454-:d:1597347

Access Statistics for this article

Land is currently edited by Ms. Carol Ma

More articles in Land from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-22
Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:3:p:454-:d:1597347