EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Impacts of Future Crop Tree Release Treatments on Forest Carbon as REDD+ Mitigation Benefits

Sebastian Gräfe and Michael Köhl
Additional contact information
Sebastian Gräfe: World Forestry, University of Hamburg, D-21031 Hamburg, Germany
Michael Köhl: World Forestry, University of Hamburg, D-21031 Hamburg, Germany

Land, 2020, vol. 9, issue 10, 1-17

Abstract: Sustainable forest management activities, such as future crop tree (FCT) release treatments, became part of the REDD+ strategy to avoid carbon emissions from forests. FCT release treatments are intended to achieve increased growth of FCTs by removing competitor trees. This initially leads to a reduction of the forest carbon pool and represents a carbon debt. We estimated that the time it takes for FCTs to offset the carbon debt through increased growth on experimental sites of 10 km² in Belize, Guyana, Suriname, and Trinidad and Tobago. We further investigated whether the costs of treatment can be compensated by the generated financial carbon benefits. An average of 2.3 FCT per hectare were released through the removal of an average of 3.3 competitors per hectare. This corresponds to an average above ground biomass (AGB) deficit of 2.3 Mg FCT −1 . Assuming a 30% increase in growth, the FCT would need on average 130 years to offset the carbon loss. For carbon prices from US$ 5 to 100 Mg CO 2 e −1 an additional increment between 0.6 and 22.7 Mg tree −1 would be required to cover the treatment costs of US$ 4.2 to 8.4 FCT −1 . Assuming a carbon price of US$ 10 Mg CO 2 e −1 , the additional increment required would be between 5.8 and 11.4 Mg tree −1 , thus exceeding the biological growth potential of most individual trees. The release of FCTs does not ensure an increase in forest carbon stocks, and refinancing of treatment costs is problematic.

Keywords: forest biomass; forest carbon; mitigation; REDD+; sustainable forest management; silvicultural treatments (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q15 Q2 Q24 Q28 Q5 R14 R52 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/9/10/394/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/9/10/394/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jlands:v:9:y:2020:i:10:p:394-:d:430873

Access Statistics for this article

Land is currently edited by Ms. Carol Ma

More articles in Land from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:9:y:2020:i:10:p:394-:d:430873