Effects of Land Certification for Rural Farm Households in Ethiopia: Evidence from Gozamin District, Ethiopia

Abebaw Andarge Gedefaw, Clement Atzberger, Walter Seher, Sayeh Kassaw Agegnehu and Reinfried Mansberger
Additional contact information
Abebaw Andarge Gedefaw: Institute of Geomatics, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna (BOKU), Peter Jordan-Strasse 82, 1190 Vienna, Austria
Clement Atzberger: Institute of Geomatics, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna (BOKU), Peter Jordan-Strasse 82, 1190 Vienna, Austria
Walter Seher: Institute of Spatial Planning, Environmental Planning and Land Rearrangement, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna (BOKU), Peter Jordan-Strasse 82, 1190 Vienna, Austria
Sayeh Kassaw Agegnehu: Institute of Land Administration, Debre Markos University (DMU), Debre Markos 269, Ethiopia
Reinfried Mansberger: Institute of Geomatics, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna (BOKU), Peter Jordan-Strasse 82, 1190 Vienna, Austria

Land, 2020, vol. 9, issue 11, 1-23

Abstract: Economic theory notes tenure security is a critical factor in agricultural investment and productivity. Therefore, several African countries’ development initiatives enabled land titling to enhance tenure security. This paper examines the effect of land certification on tenure security, land investment, crop productivity and land dispute in Gozamin District, Ethiopia. In addition, the impact of land certification on farm households’ perceptions and confidence in land tenure and land use rights is investigated. Face-to-face interviews with 343 randomly selected farm households, group discussions and expert panels are the sources of primary data. Quantitative data are analyzed using various statistical tools and complemented by qualitative data. According to the results, most farm households (56%) feel that their land use rights are secure after the certification process. Only 17% fear that the government at any time could take their land use rights. The majority of farm households (71.7%) identified a reduction of disputes after certification and land management practices improved from 70.3% before certification to 90.1% after certification. As key factors for the increase of terracing and the application of manure, the study determined total farm size, the average distance from farm to homestead, perception of degradation, access to credit, training to land resource management, fear about land take-over by the government and total livestock holdings. Crop productivity improved significantly after land certification. The results should encourage policy makers to minimize the sources of insecurity, such as frustrations of future land redistribution and land taking without proper land compensation. Land certification is the right tool for creating tenure security, enhancing farmers’ confidence in their land rights and—supported by a proper land use planning system—improving land-related investments and crop productivity.

Keywords: boundary conflict; land certification; land investment; manure use; perceived tenure security; terracing (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q15 Q2 Q24 Q28 Q5 R14 R52 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (6)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/9/11/421/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/9/11/421/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jlands:v:9:y:2020:i:11:p:421-:d:437631

Access Statistics for this article

Land is currently edited by Ms. Carol Ma

More articles in Land from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().