Untangle the Complex Stakeholder Relationships in Rural Settlement Consolidation in China: A Social Network Approach

Fan Yang, Guangqing Chi, Ge Wang, Shirui Tang, Yunting Li and Cong Ju
Additional contact information
Fan Yang: College of Public Administration, Huazhong Agricultural University, 1 Shizishan Street, Wuhan 430070, China
Guangqing Chi: Department of Agricultural Economics, Sociology, and Education, Population Research Institute, and Social Science Research Institute, The Pennsylvania State University, 112E Armsby, University Park, PA 16802, USA
Ge Wang: College of Public Administration, Huazhong Agricultural University, 1 Shizishan Street, Wuhan 430070, China
Shirui Tang: College of Public Administration, Huazhong Agricultural University, 1 Shizishan Street, Wuhan 430070, China
Yunting Li: College of Public Administration, Huazhong Agricultural University, 1 Shizishan Street, Wuhan 430070, China
Cong Ju: College of Public Administration, Huazhong Agricultural University, 1 Shizishan Street, Wuhan 430070, China

Land, 2020, vol. 9, issue 7, 1-19

Abstract: Rural settlement consolidation (RSC) has a critical role in facilitating the transformation of human settlement and land use transition in the rural revitalization process. RSC involves a diversity of stakeholder groups with complex and intertwined concerns. It is therefore crucial to identify the key stakeholders and their main concerns to effectively align rural planning and policymaking. However, this line of research remains underdeveloped. This study provides a novel and holistic network perspective for unpacking the complex relationships among different stakeholders. The results indicate: (1) the network of stakeholder concerns is relatively sparse, with 68 concern nodes and 159 concern ties; (2) The village committee, centralized residents, and contractors occupy the core position within the concerns network, while the local government has the majority of strongly connected nodes; (3) The lists of prominent concern nodes and ties are identified by different network indices, including the degree difference, the out-status centrality, closeness centrality, node betweenness centrality, and link betweenness centrality; (4) The main interaction type among stakeholder groups can be classified into five categories: financing, psychological attachment, stakeholder participation, project management, and the improvement in living conditions and infrastructure. This study reveals the relatively weak status of residents, the pivotal role of the village committee, as well as the indispensable part of the contractor and township government, with the aim to provide targeted guidance and decision-making supports for strengthening interactions and cooperation among different stakeholder groups. The findings shed new light on performing the multi-tasks of RSC and facilitating the sustainable management of rural areas.

Keywords: rural settlements; land use transition; stakeholder; social network analysis; case study (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q15 Q2 Q24 Q28 Q5 R14 R52 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (10)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/9/7/210/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/9/7/210/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jlands:v:9:y:2020:i:7:p:210-:d:377691

Access Statistics for this article

Land is currently edited by Ms. Carol Ma

More articles in Land from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().