Why Chinese Financial Market Investors Do Not Care about Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence from Mergers and Acquisitions

Minghui Li, Faqin Lan and Fang Zhang
Additional contact information
Minghui Li: Faculty of Economics and Management, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China
Faqin Lan: Faculty of Economics and Management, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China
Fang Zhang: Faculty of Economics and Management, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China

Sustainability, 2019, vol. 11, issue 11, 1-34

Abstract: We used the corporate social responsibility (CSR) data from Hexun Finance to analyze the three channels of market investor evaluation in the process of Chinese listed companies’ mergers and acquisitions (M&A). We found that: (1) because many CSR behaviors of Chinese listed companies are passive, driven by the environment, government, and regulatory authority, rather than proactive CSR for the long-term interests of the company, Chinese market investors are not concerned with the CSR performance of acquirers before the merger; (2) because passive CSR behavior cannot change the system risk and heterogeneity risk of the acquirers, CSR has no effect on the investor evaluation at the acquirer merger; (3) passive CSR can be used to evaluate public opinion, but CSR cannot change the market concerns of investors because investors only consider the systemic risks and heterogeneity rather than the social media evaluation of the company when pricing; and (4) with further study of the integration effect of CSR after M&A, we found that CSR does not reduce the M&A premium, only increases the return on asset (ROA) of the company within one year after M&A, and does not improve the company’s ROA for a long time. Our conclusions help explain why Chinese financial market investors are not concerned with the CSR performance of the M&A party prior to M&A.

Keywords: corporate social responsibility; mergers and acquisitions; passive CSR; market investor response (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/11/3144/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/11/3144/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:11:p:3144-:d:237054

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().