Transformational Changes and Sustainability: From the Perspective of Identity, Trust, Commitment, and Withdrawal

Ambreen Malik, Muhammad Naseer Akhtar, Usman Talat and Kirk Chang
Additional contact information
Ambreen Malik: NUST Business School, National University of Sciences & Technology, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan
Muhammad Naseer Akhtar: NUST Business School, National University of Sciences & Technology, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan
Usman Talat: Warwick Business School, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK
Kirk Chang: Salford Business School, University of Salford, Manchester M5 4WT, UK

Sustainability, 2019, vol. 11, issue 11, 1-21

Abstract: Drawing upon the psychology of sustainability, effective organizations can create a sense of belongingness for people, and successfully facilitate growth and development activities for both individuals as well as the organization itself. Extending the recommendations of Zappala, Toscano, and Licciardello, the current study considers a range of variables. The role of overall justice judgements and change favorableness are taken as predictors of affective commitment to change and exit-based withdrawal. The relationship is mediated by organizational identification and moderated by trust in organization. Overall, the results support the hypothesized relationships. Specifically, findings showed that both change favorableness and overall justice judgements are positively related to affective commitment to change and negatively related to exit-based withdrawal. Organizational identification mediates the relationships between overall justice judgements–affective commitment to change, change favorableness–affective commitment to change, and change favorableness–exit-based withdrawal, whilst trust in organizations moderated the direct relationship between overall justice judgements–affective commitment to change, and change favorableness–exit-based withdrawal. Furthermore, the indirect effect of trust in organizations positively moderated the relationship of overall justice judgements and change favorableness with affective commitment to change, and at the same time, it negatively moderated the relationship between change favorableness and exit-based withdrawal via organizational identification. Crucially, for practitioners, this brings trust of employees as a key factor that should be managed to ensure sustainable change. Both trust and identity appear important in improving commitment and lowering the exit-based withdrawal behavior of employees. Future recommendations, implications, and limitations are discussed.

Keywords: affective commitment to change; exit-based withdrawal; overall justice judgements; trust in organization; organizational identification; change favorableness; transformational changes (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/11/3159/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/11/3159/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:11:p:3159-:d:237339

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().