Universal Basic Income and Inclusive Capitalism: Consequences for Sustainability

Ralph P. Hall, Robert Ashford, Nicholas A. Ashford and Johan Arango-Quiroga
Additional contact information
Ralph P. Hall: School of Public and International Affairs, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA
Robert Ashford: College of Law, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY 13244, USA
Nicholas A. Ashford: Technology and Law Program, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
Johan Arango-Quiroga: Sustainability Program, Harvard University, Extension School, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA

Sustainability, 2019, vol. 11, issue 16, 1-29

Abstract: Over the past forty years, income growth for the middle and lower classes has stagnated, while the economy (and with it, economic inequality) has grown significantly. Early automation, the decline of labor unions, changes in corporate taxation, the financialization and globalization of the economy, deindustrialization in the U.S. and many OECD countries, and trade have contributed to these trends. However, the transformative roles of more recent automation and digital technologies/artificial intelligence (AI) are now considered by many as additional and potentially more potent forces undermining the ability of workers to maintain their foothold in the economy. These drivers of change are intensifying the extent to which advancing technology imbedded in increasingly productive real capital is driving productivity. To compound the problem, many solutions presented by industrialized nations to environmental problems rely on hyper-efficient technologies, which if fully implemented, could further advance the displacement of well-paid job opportunities for many. While there are numerous ways to address economic inequality, there is growing interest in using some form of universal basic income (UBI) to enhance income and provide economic stability. However, these approaches rarely consider the potential environmental impact from the likely increase in aggregate demand for goods and services or consider ways to focus this demand on more sustainable forms of consumption. Based on the premise that the problems of income distribution and environmental sustainability must be addressed in an integrated and holistic way, this paper considers how a range of approaches to financing a UBI system, and a complementary market solution based on an ownership-broadening approach to inclusive capitalism, might advance or undermine strategies to improve environmental sustainability.

Keywords: universal basic income (UBI); effective demand; inequality; environment; sustainability; inclusive capitalism; binary economics; capital ownership; fuller employment; worker ownership (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (11)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/16/4481/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/16/4481/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:16:p:4481-:d:258865

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().